Insights
Press releases, client alerts, speaking engagements, and other news
Federal Circuit Rules that Section 315(e)(1) Estoppel Does Not Apply to Pending Ex-Parte Reexamination and that the Patent Office has Jurisdiction to Adjudicate Expired Patents During Ex-Parte Reexamination
The Federal Circuit, in In re Gesture Tech. Partners, LLC, 2025-1075 (Dec. 1, 2025), clarified that the IPR estoppel provision, 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(1), does not apply to pending ex parte...
Federal Circuit Rules that Section 315(e)(1) Estoppel Does Not Apply to Pending Ex-Parte Reexamination and that the Patent Office has Jurisdiction to Adjudicate Expired Patents During Ex-Parte Reexamination
The Federal Circuit, in In re Gesture Tech. Partners, LLC, 2025-1075 (Dec. 1, 2025), clarified that the IPR estoppel provision, 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(1), does not apply to pending ex parte reexamination proceedings, as well as that the Patent Office has jurisdiction to...
Federal Circuit Rules that Section 315(e)(1) Estoppel Does Not Apply to Pending Ex-Parte Reexamination and that the Patent Office has Jurisdiction to Adjudicate Expired Patents During Ex-Parte Reexamination
Recent Federal Circuit Decision Spotlights the Differences in USPTO Certificates of Correction and Judicial Correction
Gemini Law LLP Honored to Receive Chambers Ranking 2026
Precedential Federal Circuit Decision Reaffirms the Broad Scope of the PTAB’s Discretion to Deny Institution of IPRs
Evaluating the USPTO Director’s First Summary Denial of IPR Petitions
IAM Global Leaders 2026 Recognizes Gemini Managing Partner Robert Cerwinski
Academics Weigh In On Efficacy of Pending Legislative Efforts To Combat “Patent Thickets” in the U.S
Gemini Lawyers Quoted in Law360
Precedential Federal Circuit Decision Serves as a Cautionary Reminder of Prosecution History Estoppel
PTAB Begins Clarifying Settled Expectations Doctrine
PTAB Expands Settled Expectations Doctrine
Long-Term Knowledge of Patent Sufficient to Deny Institution of IPR
USPTO Discontinuing Accelerated Examination Program for Utility Applications
Gemini Partners Ranked in Chambers USA 2025 Guide
Dr. Lora Green Recognized in Top 50 Women in PTAB Trials 2025
Acting USPTO Director Issues Precedential Decision Regarding Prior Art Cited in an IDS
Federal Circuit Rules that Section 315(e)(1) Estoppel Does Not Apply to Pending Ex-Parte Reexamination and that the Patent Office has Jurisdiction to Adjudicate Expired Patents During Ex-Parte Reexamination
Recent Federal Circuit Decision Spotlights the Differences in USPTO Certificates of Correction and Judicial Correction
Precedential Federal Circuit Decision Reaffirms the Broad Scope of the PTAB’s Discretion to Deny Institution of IPRs
Evaluating the USPTO Director’s First Summary Denial of IPR Petitions
Academics Weigh In On Efficacy of Pending Legislative Efforts To Combat “Patent Thickets” in the U.S
Precedential Federal Circuit Decision Serves as a Cautionary Reminder of Prosecution History Estoppel
PTAB Begins Clarifying Settled Expectations Doctrine
PTAB Expands Settled Expectations Doctrine
Gemini Law LLP Honored to Receive Chambers Ranking 2026
IAM Global Leaders 2026 Recognizes Gemini Managing Partner Robert Cerwinski
Gemini Lawyers Quoted in Law360
Gemini Partners Ranked in Chambers USA 2025 Guide
Dr. Lora Green Recognized in Top 50 Women in PTAB Trials 2025
