Insights
Press releases, client alerts, speaking engagements, and other news
USPTO Issues Proposed Rule Requiring Registered U.S. Patent Practitioner for Foreign Patent Applicants and Owners
On December 23, 2025, the USPTO filed a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM No. 2025-23917), proposing that all foreign-domiciled patent applicants, patent owners, and other parties be represented...
USPTO Issues Proposed Rule Requiring Registered U.S. Patent Practitioner for Foreign Patent Applicants and Owners
On December 23, 2025, the USPTO filed a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM No. 2025-23917), proposing that all foreign-domiciled patent applicants, patent owners, and other parties be represented by a U.S.-registered patent practitioner in all patent matters before...
USPTO Issues Proposed Rule Requiring Registered U.S. Patent Practitioner for Foreign Patent Applicants and Owners
Federal Circuit Denies Mandamus in Second Wave of Mandamus Petitions Challenging Discretionary Denials of IPRs
Gemini Featured in Managing IP Article on “Industry Disruptors”
Federal Circuit Rules that Section 315(e)(1) Estoppel Does Not Apply to Pending Ex-Parte Reexamination and that the Patent Office has Jurisdiction to Adjudicate Expired Patents During Ex-Parte Reexamination
Recent Federal Circuit Decision Spotlights the Differences in USPTO Certificates of Correction and Judicial Correction
Gemini Law LLP Honored to Receive Chambers Ranking 2026
Precedential Federal Circuit Decision Reaffirms the Broad Scope of the PTAB’s Discretion to Deny Institution of IPRs
Evaluating the USPTO Director’s First Summary Denial of IPR Petitions
IAM Global Leaders 2026 Recognizes Gemini Managing Partner Robert Cerwinski
Academics Weigh In On Efficacy of Pending Legislative Efforts To Combat “Patent Thickets” in the U.S
Gemini Lawyers Quoted in Law360
Precedential Federal Circuit Decision Serves as a Cautionary Reminder of Prosecution History Estoppel
PTAB Begins Clarifying Settled Expectations Doctrine
PTAB Expands Settled Expectations Doctrine
Long-Term Knowledge of Patent Sufficient to Deny Institution of IPR
USPTO Discontinuing Accelerated Examination Program for Utility Applications
USPTO Issues Proposed Rule Requiring Registered U.S. Patent Practitioner for Foreign Patent Applicants and Owners
Federal Circuit Denies Mandamus in Second Wave of Mandamus Petitions Challenging Discretionary Denials of IPRs
Federal Circuit Rules that Section 315(e)(1) Estoppel Does Not Apply to Pending Ex-Parte Reexamination and that the Patent Office has Jurisdiction to Adjudicate Expired Patents During Ex-Parte Reexamination
Recent Federal Circuit Decision Spotlights the Differences in USPTO Certificates of Correction and Judicial Correction
Precedential Federal Circuit Decision Reaffirms the Broad Scope of the PTAB’s Discretion to Deny Institution of IPRs
Evaluating the USPTO Director’s First Summary Denial of IPR Petitions
Academics Weigh In On Efficacy of Pending Legislative Efforts To Combat “Patent Thickets” in the U.S
Precedential Federal Circuit Decision Serves as a Cautionary Reminder of Prosecution History Estoppel
Gemini Featured in Managing IP Article on “Industry Disruptors”
Gemini Law LLP Honored to Receive Chambers Ranking 2026
IAM Global Leaders 2026 Recognizes Gemini Managing Partner Robert Cerwinski
Gemini Lawyers Quoted in Law360
Gemini Partners Ranked in Chambers USA 2025 Guide
Dr. Lora Green Recognized in Top 50 Women in PTAB Trials 2025
